GroundPound.ai is part of the SurfTurf.ai family of services, built and operated by SurfTurf.ai LLC.
Workflows
Multi-stage runs with checkpoints — for the work that's too important to take an agent's first answer.
Most of the time, a single specialist drafting a response is exactly the right amount of process. But some work — a contract, a security review, an investor narrative, a high-stakes decision — deserves more than one pass. Workflows are GroundPound's structured, multi-stage runs that put several agents (and several checks) between a draft and your approval.
What ships out of the box
Every team comes with a set of ready-to-run workflows. After you sign in, start any of them from the Start a workflow button on your Atlas dashboard:
- Adversarial Review — a red-team agent challenges every claim, citation, and framing choice in a draft; the original author defends each point or concedes a fix; and you see a synthesized both-sides summary — every challenge labelled resolved, needs-review, or no-action — before you approve. (The evaluator scoring and mechanical citation checks live in the separate automatic high-stakes verification pipeline, triggered by content category rather than invoked here.)
- Roundtable — multiple specialists weigh in and converge on a consensus answer, with the disagreements surfaced rather than hidden.
- Counsel — a legal-led inquiry: lead counsel answers and flags any finance and security implications, optional finance and security checks (skippable at dispatch) weigh in, and a final memo closes with action items, owners, and a confidence level.
- Full Bench — every relevant specialist on the team contributes, for the decisions where you want the widest possible read before you commit.
How a workflow runs
A workflow is a sequence of stages. Each stage has a job — evaluate, critique, revise, check — and the run advances stage by stage with checkpoints in between. You can watch a run progress, see which stage it's on, and review the output at the end. Every run is recorded, so you have a history of what was produced and how.
Why stages instead of one big prompt
The same principle runs through all of GroundPound: breadth without accountability is where agents go wrong. A workflow makes the steps explicit and reviewable. When something in the output is off, you can see which stage produced it — not reverse-engineer a single opaque generation. And because the riskiest output passes through adversarial review before it reaches you, the approval card you eventually see has already survived a critique.
Where it fits
Workflows complement the everyday coordinator-and-specialists model. Day to day, your team triages, drafts, and hands off. When a piece of work warrants it, you route it through a workflow for the extra rigor. Workflows are available on every plan.
Related: see Atlas for the approvals queue a workflow feeds into, and the Feature guide for the full tour.
Start a workflow from the Start a workflow button on your Atlas dashboard after you sign in. Sign-in and new-account creation are paused during the re-architecture cutover. View current status.